<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Building Joomla 1.0.x component</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nzfusion.com/james/2008/07/05/building-joomla-10x-component/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nzfusion.com/james/2008/07/05/building-joomla-10x-component/</link>
	<description>technical director, web strategist, software developer and person</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 12:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Burgess</title>
		<link>http://nzfusion.com/james/2008/07/05/building-joomla-10x-component/#comment-608</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Burgess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nzfusion.com/james/?p=382#comment-608</guid>
		<description>Most likely, the "Joomla 1.3" overall title is due to the person/script that generated the docs using the "--title 'Joomla 1.3' " runtime argument.  

Further, it looks like the code itself probably contains "@package Joomla-1.0.0" tags in some docblocks, resulting in the visible "Joomla-1.0.0" package.  

As for the "Joomla 1.0.3" heading in the top right, that appears to be a package name that is _not_ used by any package tags in the code... otherwise you'd see it listed in the package name list the goes across the top of the screen.   At first I thought maybe it appears there due to usage of the "--defaultpackagename 'Joomla 1.0.3' " runtime arg, but if that were true, I don't think a package named "default" would exist.  Though, if the code itself did use "@package default" somewhere, then it probably is that runtime arg causing the "Joomla 1.0.3" to appear.

Hope that helps...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely, the &#8220;Joomla 1.3&#8243; overall title is due to the person/script that generated the docs using the &#8220;&#8211;title &#8216;Joomla 1.3&#8242; &#8221; runtime argument.  </p>
<p>Further, it looks like the code itself probably contains &#8220;@package Joomla-1.0.0&#8243; tags in some docblocks, resulting in the visible &#8220;Joomla-1.0.0&#8243; package.  </p>
<p>As for the &#8220;Joomla 1.0.3&#8243; heading in the top right, that appears to be a package name that is _not_ used by any package tags in the code&#8230; otherwise you&#8217;d see it listed in the package name list the goes across the top of the screen.   At first I thought maybe it appears there due to usage of the &#8220;&#8211;defaultpackagename &#8216;Joomla 1.0.3&#8242; &#8221; runtime arg, but if that were true, I don&#8217;t think a package named &#8220;default&#8221; would exist.  Though, if the code itself did use &#8220;@package default&#8221; somewhere, then it probably is that runtime arg causing the &#8220;Joomla 1.0.3&#8243; to appear.</p>
<p>Hope that helps&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
