There are a few resources making the Joomla source code easier to browse…
Joomla-Tipps produced using Doxygen, includes reference graphs. Which were particularly useful in working out where I should be looking for this save action! Unfortunately the notes are in German… but the Joomla source comments are still in English…
Digression: Do people think that language keywords should be in the developers language? I think that source code files should start with a locale declaration that defines the language setting for the compiler or interpreter…
The Joomla API Reference, built using phpDocumentor. For some reason the title is Joomla 1.3, but the top frame is Joomla 1.0.3 and the latest Joomla version in this branch is 1.0.15…
Writing a simple module… Writing a simple component…
Last 5 posts by James Little- Drew Ginn resting after the Olympics - September 8th, 2008
- Sneakerplay: The social network for sneakers? - September 8th, 2008
- The Waikato Great Race 2008 - September 7th, 2008
- Facebook about to introduce adult content? - September 4th, 2008
- Gradjobs New Zealand is live - September 2nd, 2008
One Comment
Most likely, the “Joomla 1.3″ overall title is due to the person/script that generated the docs using the “–title ‘Joomla 1.3′ ” runtime argument.
Further, it looks like the code itself probably contains “@package Joomla-1.0.0″ tags in some docblocks, resulting in the visible “Joomla-1.0.0″ package.
As for the “Joomla 1.0.3″ heading in the top right, that appears to be a package name that is _not_ used by any package tags in the code… otherwise you’d see it listed in the package name list the goes across the top of the screen. At first I thought maybe it appears there due to usage of the “–defaultpackagename ‘Joomla 1.0.3′ ” runtime arg, but if that were true, I don’t think a package named “default” would exist. Though, if the code itself did use “@package default” somewhere, then it probably is that runtime arg causing the “Joomla 1.0.3″ to appear.
Hope that helps…